




What does "it is the wicked who are saved" mean? The answer Shinran arrived at after 90 years
//Summary - Level-C1//
The text introduces Shinran (1173–1262), founder of Jōdo Shinshū, whose teachings grew out of a lifelong struggle with the limits of ascetic practice. After years of Tendai training and later study under Hōnen, he embraced faith in Amida Buddha’s saving vow rather than self-powered enlightenment. Exiled during the persecution of the Jōdo movement, Shinran married and lived as an ordinary person, which shaped his belief that salvation is available to all. His central doctrine, expressed in “even the virtuous attain rebirth, how much more so the wicked,” emphasises compassion, equality, and reliance on Amida’s grace for those burdened by human weakness and suffering.
1)
People live their lives in confusion. This has remained unchanged throughout history, in both the West and the East. History books do not record the ‘inner thoughts’ of people. However, by examining the religions of the time, we can catch a glimpse of what troubled the people of that era.
2)
This article introduces Shinran, the founder of Jōdo Shinshū. He preached the teachings of Pure Land Buddhism, which involve chanting ‘Namu Amida Butsu’ to honour Amida Buddha and be saved by him, and held a philosophy of equality—which could be described as ultimate—expressed in the words: ‘If even the virtuous attain rebirth, how much more so the wicked?’
So, what sort of life did he lead before arriving at this philosophy?
3)
Shinran’s Early Life:
Shinran was born during the heyday of the Taira clan, when Taira no Kiyomori was at the height of his power. It is believed to have been in the third year of the Jōan era (1173). His father, Hino Arinori, was a nobleman who served the Empress. The Emperor at that time was Emperor Takakura, and the Empress was Noriko (or Tokushi), the daughter of Kiyomori.
Although Shinran’s name changed several times during his childhood, we will refer to him consistently as ‘Shinran’ in this article.
4)
Shinran’s Ordination:
In Jishō 5 (1181), when the young Shinran was nine years old by the traditional Japanese counting system, he entered Shōren-in and took monastic vows. One reason, it is thought, was the great famine that struck the Kyoto area that year. It is said that he subsequently undertook ascetic training at Enryaku-ji on Mount Hiei for approximately 20 years.
5)
Hatsusaburō Yoshida, *Illustrated Guide to the Famous Places of Enryaku-ji on Mount Hiei*; Source: Kyoto Prefectural Kyoto-gaku Rekisai-kan Historical Materials Archive
6)
Both Shōren-in and Mount Hiei are temples of the Tendai school. Although he continued his training for many years within the Tendai school—which seeks enlightenment through rigorous ascetic practice—Shinran apparently did not feel that this form of practice suited him.
7)
His Encounter with Hōnen:
In the first year of the Ken’nin era (1201), at the age of 29 (by the traditional Japanese counting system), Shinran descended from Mount Hiei and undertook a hundred-day retreat in the Rokkaku-dō hall at Chōhō-ji Temple, which is said to have been founded by Prince Shōtoku. There, Prince Shōtoku appeared to him in a dream and told him, ‘Go and meet Hōnen.’
Hōnen was a monk forty years Shinran’s senior who, like Shinran, had trained on Mount Hiei and later became the founder of the Jōdo-shū school. Shinran immediately went to Hōnen and studied his teachings.
8)
‘Portrait of Hōnen Shōnin’ Source: Keio University (Century Akao Collection)
9)
Shinran was particularly moved by the teaching of ‘Senju Nenbutsu’ (exclusive practice of the Nembutsu), which emphasised faith in Amida Buddha and the single-minded recitation of the Nembutsu. As he trained under Hōnen, he gradually earned high regard.
10)
The Persecution of the Jōdo Sect:
However, to other sects—which held the belief that one must undergo rigorous ascetic practice to reach the Pure Land—the teachings of the Jōdo Sect, which preached that one could reach the Pure Land simply by chanting the Nembutsu, must have appeared deviant. Petitions began to be submitted to the Imperial Court, urging it to issue an order to stop Nembutsu practice.
11)
Then, in February of Ken’ei 2 (1207), the Jōdo-shū incurred the wrath of Emperor Go-Toba. The cause was an incident in which two lady-in-waiting (high-ranking court ladies) serving Emperor Go-Toba converted to the Jōdo-shū and took monastic vows while he was away. Furthermore, rumours that these ladies had been having an affair with a monk were the cause of Emperor Go-Toba’s fierce anger.
12)
Monks involved in the ordination of married women were sentenced to death. Hōnen and Shinran were stripped of their monastic status, forcibly returned to lay life, and exiled; Hōnen was exiled to Tosa Province (present-day Kōchi Prefecture), whilst Shinran was exiled to Echigo Province (present-day Niigata Prefecture). This incident is known as the ‘Jōgen Persecution’.
13)
A Monk Who Was Married:
Here, I would like to share an unusual anecdote about Shinran. In fact, Shinran was married. In Buddhism at that time, monks were expected to remain celibate, and physical relations with women were forbidden.
However, it is said that Hōnen taught that ‘Amida Buddha saves us all, whether we are monks or not’. Although Hōnen himself was not married, Shinran, following this teaching, later married a woman known as Eshin-ni and had children with her.
14)
Saichirō Tanaka, ‘Eshin-ni’ – Source: Aichi Prefectural Museum of Art
15)
Although the exact date of his marriage to Eshin-ni is unclear, she accompanied him into exile in Echigo and remained by his side for the rest of his life.
16)
From Return to Kyoto to the Bando Region:
In November of the first year of the Kenryaku era (1211), nearly five years after their exile, Hōnen and Shinran were finally granted permission to return to Kyoto. Upon hearing that Hōnen had arrived in Kyoto, Shinran also wished to meet his master; however, heavy snowfall in Echigo Province kept him from travelling. He waited for spring, but in January of the following year, Kenryaku 2 (1212), Hōnen died at age 80.
17)
Shinran’s movements immediately following this are unclear. Some say he either remained in Echigo Province or returned to Kyoto.
Shinran set out again in Kenpō 2 (1214). Aged 42, he travelled to the Kantō region to carry out missionary work. He established a base in Hitachi Province (present-day Ibaraki Prefecture) and devoted himself to missionary work for approximately twenty years.
Upon reaching his sixties, he returned to Kyoto, where he devoted himself to writing. Over the next thirty years or so, he authored numerous works before passing away in the second year of the Kōchō era (1262) at the age of ninety.
18)
Shinran’s Teachings:
Shinran left behind numerous writings until his death, but his most representative work is known as the *Kyōgyōshinshō*. Its formal title is *Kenjōdo Shinjitsu Kyōgyōshō Monrui*.
19)
It is a six-volume Jōdo Shinshū scripture. Its content consists of a commentary on Hōnen’s treatise, the *Senchaku-shū* (*Senjaku-shū*). The original manuscript in Shinran’s own handwriting is now designated a National Treasure.
It is difficult to summarise its contents in a few words, given that numerous books have been written since the Edo period solely to comment on the *Kyōgyōshinshō*… However, the preface reads as follows.
20)
On Other-Power:
The unfathomable great vow is a mighty ship that ferries beings across the sea of suffering.
The vows of the Bodhisattva are of a realm that is, for the most part, beyond human comprehension. Whilst the act of ‘making a vow’ typically requires one to undertake ascetic practices commensurate with that vow, Amida Tathāgata has made a boundless vow such as ‘to save all living beings in this world’.
21)
‘Statue of Amida Tathāgata’ – Adapted from ColBase
Therefore, rather than practising asceticism ourselves, let us rely on the vows made by Amida Tathāgata. It is precisely this—that Amida Tathāgata’s vows are the ‘Sea of Difficulty’… and become the great ship that carries us across a life filled with endless human suffering and delusion…—that explains the concept of ‘Salvation through the Power of Another’ (Tariki Hongan).
22)
The unimpeded light is the sun of wisdom that dispels the darkness of ignorance.
This lies at the very heart of the teachings of Pure Land Buddhism. When people feel lonely, they feel that way even when many people are around them. However, Pure Land Buddhism teaches that ‘there is no need to remain in the darkness’ ‘If you dispel the darkness in which you have shut yourself away, believing yourself to be alone, your world will expand,’ it teaches.
23)
Normally, expanding one’s world and entering the bright light would require rigorous ascetic practice. However, in the teachings of Pure Land Buddhism, the light that dispels that loneliness is the ‘Light of Enlightenment’. That is to say, it is the Vows of Amitābha Tathāgata. It is written that this light is like the sun (the Sun of Wisdom) that can never be obscured……
24)
Regarding the ‘Evildoers as the True Object of Salvation’:
Equally saving the multitude of those in suffering, the Compassion of the World-Honoured One extends even to those who are utterly depraved and slander the Dharma.
‘The multitude’ refers to those suffering from afflictions, whilst ‘the World-Honoured One’ refers to the Buddha. The ‘reverse’ in ‘reverse-slanderers and those of the Cāndala nature’ refers to the ‘Five Grave Offences’—the five most serious sins in Buddhism: ‘killing one’s father’, ‘killing one’s mother’, ‘killing an enlightened sage’, ‘wounding the Buddha’s body and causing him to bleed’, and ‘disrupting the harmony of the sangha and causing division’.
25)
Furthermore, ‘slander’ (bō) refers to criticising and attacking the Buddha’s teachings, whilst ‘Candala’ denotes a lack of faith in Buddhist teachings. Buddhism has traditionally regarded those who commit these sins as ‘wretched evildoers beyond salvation’.
However, if Amida Tathāgata is to save all living beings in this world, then he will extend a helping hand even to such evildoers. This implies that the Pure Land teachings are intended precisely for such people.
26)
This embodies the very concept of ‘the wicked as the true object of salvation’ (akunin shōki) put forward by Shinran. The phrase ‘If even the virtuous attain rebirth, how much more so the wicked?’ means that ‘the salvation of the wicked is precisely the vow of Amida Tathāgata’. Furthermore, the method by which such wicked people are saved is encapsulated in the term ‘salvation through the power of another’ (tariki hongan).
27)
What Shinran sought to save:
When one hears the term ‘Tarikihongan’, there is a tendency to view it as a negative concept—as if one were simply handing over one’s responsibilities to another and claiming the task has been completed. However, when it comes to seeking salvation through Buddhism, how many people are actually capable of enduring the rigorous ascetic practices that are a matter of life and death?
28)
Shinran was a man who, having harboured doubts about the ascetic practices on Mount Hiei, descended from the mountain. Moreover, he was married—a taboo in Buddhism at the time—and even had children. When he pondered deeply, asking, ‘I cannot complete a single ascetic practice. Why is it that I cannot…?’, Shinran concluded that ‘it is because my very nature is that of an evil person’.
29)
Of course, Shinran had never killed anyone, nor had he ever stolen anything or harmed anyone. The term ‘evil person’ used here does not refer to a ‘criminal’ in the modern sense.
If one is unable to practise asceticism, one has no choice but to rely on the vows of Amida Tathāgata (other-power). This leads to the conclusion that ‘I, who rely on other-power, am an evil person’. However, an evil person cannot practise asceticism on their own. That is precisely why they have no choice but to rely on other-power. These words strike at the very heart of such a person’s deep karma.
30)
Jōdo Shinshū after Shinran’s death:
Often, after the death of a great leader, differences in interpreting their teachings lead to the formation of various sects. At times, the teachings take on a life of their own, straying far from the original intent; lamenting this, one of Shinran’s direct disciples recorded his thoughts in the *Tannishō* (Treatise on Differing Opinions), presenting them as Shinran’s own words.
31)
Whilst there are various theories regarding the author, the most likely candidate at present is Yuien, a direct disciple of Shinran in his later years. Rennyo, a Jōdo Shinshū monk of the Muromachi period, later transcribed it, and it became widely known.
32)
As the *Tannishō* is written in relatively simple language, it is often read as an introductory text to Shinran’s philosophy. It is also peppered with words of comfort that offer solace to the negative emotions everyone experiences, such as ‘Why do only bad things happen to me?’ or ‘Why does nothing ever go right for me, no matter what I do?’
33)
Having encountered Shinran’s teachings in this way, I found myself thinking that perhaps Shinran was, after all, just an ordinary person… I sense that somewhere deep down, he harboured the desire: ‘First and foremost, I want to be saved myself.’
34)
Although he was a monk, he did not undertake rigorous ascetic practices; he married and even had children… If he could show that someone like himself—full of contradictions and burdened with deep karma—could be saved, then others too would harbour the hope that ‘perhaps I, too, can be saved’. If he demonstrated it through his own practice, others would likely take that first step, thinking, ‘Perhaps I can do it too.’ Personally, I think that is how he viewed things.
35)
It is precisely because he was that sort of person that Shinran’s teachings have endured for 800 years—even as eras and values have changed—as words that seem to reach out to ‘those in distress’ across the ages.
What does "it is the wicked who are saved" mean? The answer Shinran arrived at after 90 years
https://intojapanwaraku.com/culture/312018/






































